.webp){kind=small}
I run a fiduciary wealth planning practice that has come, somewhat by accident of geography and referral, to specialize in working with SpaceX employees. People arrived with concentrated positions and wanted to know what to do about them. They had incentive stock options and had heard something ominous about the alternative minimum tax. They had restricted stock units vesting into a company whose shares they could not sell except during a narrow window twice a year. They wanted to know how much to hold and how much to let go.
What began to catch my attention was not the questions. It was the people asking them.
Some were engineers, of course. But most were not. They were manufacturing technicians and machinists, welders who had spent years joining stainless steel in South Texas, electricians and production supervisors and quality inspectors, people who ran mills and lathes and cranes.
That didn't happen by accident, and it didn't happen because of a market. It happened because a founder decided, over and over across twenty-four years, that the people building the rockets should own part of the company building them — and then structured his company so that decision actually paid out to them.
Whatever else you think about Elon Musk, and people think a great deal about him in both directions; he did this. It is the least-discussed thing he has ever done, and I'd argue it's among the most consequential.
The men who poured steel at Homestead did not own Carnegie Steel. The workers who assembled Model Ts at Highland Park did not own Ford. The people who riveted the skyscrapers, laid the interstates, wired the airliners, and built the hardware that reached the moon were paid for their hours and sent home.
That wasn't necessarily a raw deal. The twentieth-century industrial bargain, at its best, was one of the better arrangements ordinary people have been offered. Ford's five-dollar day was real money. Postwar union contracts produced rising wages, health coverage, and pensions today's workers would take in a heartbeat. Millions of families walked into the middle class through a factory gate.
But look closely at what was traded. Labor got a claim on the company's cash flow — wages, benefits, a check every month in retirement. Labor almost never got a claim on the company's value. When the enterprise a man spent thirty years building became worth ten or a hundred times what it had been the morning he first clocked in, that appreciation went somewhere. It did not go to him.
Silicon Valley eventually rewrote the rule, but only partway. Broad-based equity became standard, and a generation built serious wealth from stock rather than salary. That change mostly reached people with degrees and desks. The American story of employee ownership is overwhelmingly a story about people who work with information.
Which is what makes a rocket factory such a strange place to find it, and why the man who put it there deserves more credit than he gets.
He granted equity to the whole building. SpaceX paid people partly in stock rather than entirely in cash, and the grants went out broadly rather than being reserved for executives and senior engineers. If you were on the floor, you got some. This began partly out of necessity — for years the company was one bad launch from insolvency and cash was the thing it had least of — but necessity explains the first year, not the twenty-third. By the end, employees are estimated to have held something on the order of a tenth of the company.
He built an internal market for people who couldn't wait. Owning stock in a private company is ordinarily a promise, not an asset; you cannot pay a mortgage with it, and most founders are content to let employees wait a decade for an exit that may never come. SpaceX instead ran tender offers roughly twice a year, in which the company set a price and let employees sell a slice of their vested shares to approved investors. It was an internal stock exchange for people who needed money now, run by a company under zero obligation to provide one.
He structured the IPO around the people inside the building. In June 2026, SpaceX went public at $135 a share, raised roughly $75 billion, and became the largest public offering in history. A listing of that size normally hands the allocation to institutions. This one reserved roughly 30 percent of the offering for retail investors, and set aside up to 5 percent in a directed share program for employees and people connected to the company — shares exempt from the lockup restrictions that bind everyone else, including the founder himself.
Software is abstract. When a software company becomes worth a hundred billion dollars, the value was made by people typing — brilliant people doing hard things, but work that leaves no fingerprints on any object you could pick up. Nearly the entire mythology of employee ownership in this country rests on that kind of labor.
Rockets are not abstract. A booster has to be machined before it can be launched. Tanks get formed and welded. Engines are assembled by human beings holding tools. Harnesses are routed by hand. Somebody who knows what a bad weld looks like puts her eyes on the seam. Vehicles are trucked, craned, stacked, fired, torn down, inspected, and flown again. When a booster comes home and lands on a ship in the Atlantic, someone has to go out and make it worthy of a second flight.
Which means that in this one company, the person who closed the seam on the tank owns a piece of the enterprise the tank enriched. Twenty-two thousand people work there, and a great many of them work with their hands.
We have been telling ourselves for two centuries that the people who build a thing ought to share in it. We've put it in speeches and platforms and Labor Day proclamations, and we have almost never done it. One founder did it, at scale, in a factory.
I see the downstream version of it at my conference table.
He joined in his late twenties to make rocket parts. The job was the draw — the parts were interesting, the pace was absurd, and the salary was solid but unremarkable for skilled manufacturing work.
Equity accumulated in the background across several grant cycles, the way sediment accumulates. Today the position is worth roughly $2.5 million.
He still introduces himself as a machinist, because that is what he is. But the largest financial question in his life is no longer whether to refinance. It is how to diversify a concentrated position without surrendering upside in a company he has watched succeed at things people told him were impossible. He has an intuition that a single stock representing 80% of his net worth is dangerous. He also has ten years of evidence that selling early was always the wrong call. Those two facts do not resolve neatly.
Manufacturing technician, spouse, two kids. He came to SpaceX from another industrial employer for the same reasons most people do — better work, better story.
He built up roughly $1.2 million in equity. After a liquidity event he did the two most boring things available: extinguished the mortgage and funded college accounts for both children.
His salary is not executive-level and will not become executive-level. His balance sheet already is. That gap — between the paycheck and the portfolio — is the entire emotional texture of his financial life. He still checks the price of a transmission repair before authorizing it. He also owns his house outright at an age when most of his high school class has twenty years left on a note.
He started in manufacturing straight out of high school. No degree, no plan beyond doing the work well. He joined SpaceX in his thirties.
The position is worth about $3.5 million.
The practical consequence is that a man who expected to work until sixty-seven now has the option to stop at fifty. The planning question has inverted. He used to ask how much he needed to retire. He now asks how not to ruin this — how to structure withdrawals, how much to move out of a single volatile stock, what a thirty-five-year retirement actually requires, whether he even wants to stop.
A senior technician, years spent on spacecraft manufacturing and testing. Roughly $1.8 million in equity.
He left, and bought a small manufacturing business.
This is the profile that says the most about what employee equity actually does. The wealth did not primarily buy him consumption. It bought him capital — the thing the American worker classically does not have and therefore cannot deploy. He moved from employee, to equity holder, to owner of the means of production, using a compensation instrument designed by a rocket company to conserve cash.
He now signs other people's paychecks. He is, by his own description, working harder than he did on the factory floor and enjoying it more.
For most of our history there has been a clean line between the people who build things and the people who own the things being built. It is one of the oldest fault lines in American economic life, and most of our politics sits on top of it.
A caution, before the conclusion: none of this is an argument about the stock. Shares go down as well as up — the market has already made that point to SpaceX's newest shareholders — and a net worth concentrated in one volatile company is a problem to be managed, not a prize to be admired. That is precisely why these people end up at a planner's conference table.
The significance is not that some employees became millionaires. Millionaires get minted every day in this country, mostly from people who were already close to money.
The significance is who it reached. Ownership — real ownership, the kind that shows up on a cap table and then on a stock exchange — reached people who would otherwise have participated in this economy entirely through wages. It reached the second shift. It reached people without degrees. It reached the shop.
That is the story. Not the size of anyone's fortune, but the reach of ownership.
Before my practice took its current shape, I viewed SpaceX the way most observers do: as a founder's company, defined by one man's ambitions and the engineers executing them.
Working with its employees has revised that view. The company I see now is the one reflected across my clients' balance sheets — the machinist who cut the part, the welder who closed the seam, the technician who caught a fault at two in the morning. Their names appear on no plaque and in no article, yet their work is in every vehicle that leaves the ground. Unusually for American manufacturing, so is their ownership.
Of all the wealth this company created, the founder's share is the least surprising part. Founders get rich; that is the oldest story we have. The genuinely new thing — the thing worth arguing about, and worth trying to repeat — is how many of the people building the rockets were allowed to own a piece of what they were building.
Article written by Brady Lochte, founder of Axon Capital Management and a fee-only fiduciary financial advisor. Brady is committed to providing clear, transparent financial guidance that helps people navigate retirement, investing, and long-term planning with confidence.
This article reflects my observations and opinions and is for general informational purposes only. It is not investment, tax, or legal advice, and it is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Equity compensation involves significant risk, including the risk of loss. Client details have been altered, and some profiles are composites, to protect confidentiality. Individual circumstances vary considerably; please consult your own advisors.
Please submit the form with any questions or comments and I'll be in touch shortly.
If you'd rather not wait, you can also book a time directly on my calendar using the link below:
Schedule a call
